Instead of whining about the tobacco companies evading the FDA tobacco law by using colors to denote the brands formerly known as "lights" or "milds," the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids and the other major anti-smoking groups should be apologizing to its constituents and to the public for knowingly crafting legislation that would not accomplish its declared purpose.

Previously, there was a significant history of tobacco-funded researchers failing to disclose their conflicts of interest. By now doing the same thing, we are blurring the distinction. Now, the public is going to question the integrity of our research, not just that conducted by or supported by the tobacco companies.

The article and commentary criticize tobacco companies for changing their labeling of "light" and "ultra-light" cigarette brands by removing these terms and instead, giving the brands different colors to differentiate them.

The Rest of the Story

LAST：2014 Health care product hicig e cigarette,ego ce5 e cigarette,ecig exgo |NEXT：2014 dna 30 mod High Quality E-cigarette 30w box mod dna 30