You see, the goal of the Tobacco Act was not to save lives, but to gain a political victory for the anti-smoking groups. The goal was to put a feather in the cap of the anti-smoking groups' national leaders, rather than to establish a rational, science-based policy designed to reduce cigarette smoking, make cigarettes safer, and promote the public's health.

One of the main criticisms of electronic cigarettes leveled by its opponents in the tobacco control movement is that there are many dual users of e-cigarettes and tobacco cigarettes and that this has adverse public health consequences.

Is this really the way we want our federal health agencies to treat cigarettes? As a product that is of such little concern that it may be no more harmful than the combination of nicotine and propylene glycol in an electronic cigarette?

This not only supports Polito's hypothesis that the report's blatant bias in reporting on smoking cessation is due to the financial conflicts of its authors, who were doing their "master's bidding," but it also suggests that the producers of this report truly have something to hide.

LAST：2014 hottest products 1300mah battery x6 e cig in stock, original x6 wholesale |NEXT：mini design smokeless 510t pcc electronic cigarette