"Nicoventures has met with the Therapeutic Goods Administration about the possible introduction of a new smoking cessation device in Australia," the statement said.

The weakness of the scientific argumentation of those opposed to electronic cigarettes demonstrates that in 2014, there simply is not much of a scientific argument to fall back on in opposing this innovation. The science isn't going to do it, so opponents have to rely on trite and meaningless assertions like:

In banning the sale of e-cigarettes to minors, the legislation defines e-cigarettes the way they should be defined: as vapor products or alternative nicotine products.

Christopher Snowdon reported the details of the story back in February. He wrote:

Dr. Glantz's comments on the lack of health benefit in cutting down on one's smoking come in response to one of the reported benefits of electronic cigarettes: that they help many smokers to cut down substantially on the amount they smoke. Glantz : "Dual users, who simultaneously use both products, are unlikely to see much, if any, health benefit because of the continued cigarette use, even if daily consumption drops." In other words, if you are still smoking, there are no benefits from cutting down on the amount you smoke thanks to e-cigarettes.

A second major advantage of a clinical trial is that it can examine the potential effectiveness of interventions in which the use of a product is promoted for use among smokers who are interested in quitting. A survey cannot do this, because it can only examine the use of products under current conditions. It provides no information on what would happen if the product was actively promoted to a group of smokers, as it is in a clinical trial.

LAST：Top selling newly designed PY-Xposed e cigarette/mechanical mod |NEXT：2014 Newly Design ecig exgo dual tank 240 hot selling