Last week, President Obama announced his answer: from smokers. The President proposed a 94 cent per pack increase in the federal cigarette tax, with revenue going to support a much needed expansion of early childhood education.

The wealthiest 1% of Americans, along with corporations that are enjoying inappropriate tax breaks.

If the Senate truly wants to reduce cigarette smoking and protect the public's health, it will shift its attack from e-cigarette companies which are trying to get the public off tobacco cigarettes and over to the federal government, which is doing everything it can to protect the cigarette market.

In other words, Glantz has hidden this information from the reader in the review article, even though he felt it was important enough to mention in the other article. In my opinion, this is knowing dishonesty. It is hiding critical information from the reader that would affect the reader's assessment of the validity of the study's conclusions. Moreover, the review article proceeds to do precisely what the other article argues cannot and should not be done with these studies (i.e., draw conclusions about the efficacy of e-cigarettes as smoking cessation aids).

LAST：2014 Tobeco Vulcan RDA Atomizer with 3 kinds screws 1:1 Clone Atomizer Vulcan RDA, Black/SS Color Vulcan Atomizer |NEXT：Most popular ecig exgo battery GS ego II 2200mah battery