While the FDA sees the problem as being that the public believes electronic cigarettes are safer than smoking, I believe the problem is that the FDA fails to grasp the clear science and to appreciate that cigarette smoking is far more hazardous than vaping.

The CDC is even worse. It actually acknowledges the existence of these former smokers, but still argues that there is no evidence that electronic cigarettes have helped any smokers quit.

There are four major reasons why hiding conflicts of interest are problematic:

Is this really the way we want our federal health agencies to treat cigarettes? As a product that is of such little concern that it may be no more harmful than the combination of nicotine and propylene glycol in an electronic cigarette?

(1) A statement that the study involves research, an explanation of the purposes of the research and the expected duration of the subject’s participation, a description of the procedures to be followed, and identification of any procedures which are experimental;

In other words, the deeming regulations place an insurmountable obstacle in the way of new and innovative products. This is disastrous because it is new products which are essential to continue to drive the market forward. It is the new products which will be safer and more effective. It is the new products that are critical to allowing electronic cigarettes to some day seriously challenge or overtake the combustible market.

LAST：Rebuildable kanger protank 2 clearomizer, Vfast protank atomizer |NEXT：Factory Price Dual Coils Ego CE4 ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE