I am not going to beat a dead horse and get into why the lack of evidence should not be a reason for supporting an outright ban. Especially since there already has been that has shown second hand vapor is a hazard to others that are not using electronic cigarettes. Instead, I am concerned with how the United Nations Organization that’s sole purpose is to battle emerging and current health crises.

Hartge et al. exactly the same result as Wynder's group: "Our data indicated that people who have only smoked unfiltered cigarettes have higher risks."

With this disregard for the basic principles of science, the FDA is undermining literally decades of public education about the severe hazards of cigarette smoking. The FDA is negating the benefits we have accrued from the tobacco companies halting their own undermining of the public's appreciation of smoking's hazards because the agency is now doing that work for the tobacco companies.

It is clear from the overall evidence that electronic cigarettes are not as risky as tobacco cigarettes in terms of acute effects on lung function. On this issue, Dr. Glantz's comment is simply wrong.

LAST：Alibaba express new product yocan exgo 510 Steampunk Mod ecig exgo atomizer exgo |NEXT：2014 new vape mod vase ecig Sales promotion activity!!!new design product gtaste ego battery caravela mod ecig