By Stan's logic, we should throw out all the clinical trials upon which the established effectiveness of NRT is based because every one of these trials was designed to assess the efficacy of NRT among smokers who used these drugs with the specific intent to quit. Instead, according to Glantz's logic, we should examine the rate of smoking cessation among everyone who has ever used an NRT product. Doing that would lead to the conclusion that NRT is completely ineffective for smoking cessation.

In a news , SAMHSA (the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration) attempted to demonize electronic cigarettes, providing a quite biased and one-sided look at the risks associated with these products. The article fails to report the results of surveys and clinical trials, which have shown that e-cigarettes are a bona fide smoking cessation aid that have helped thousands of smokers to quit.

What would be an example of such a severe problem that it warrants reporting to the FDA? to the medical branch chief in the Office of Science at FDA's Center for Tobacco Products, such a severe problem would be something like if a cigarette "just smells or tastes wrong."

In addition to violating state law by enforcing a contract on a party not subject to that contract, Representatives Waxman, Harkin, and Welch are asking their Attorneys General to violate the Compact Clause of the Constitution by entering into a compact with other states without the consent of Congress. They are asking the states to conspire to an agreement by which they would force electronic cigarette companies to become parties to a contract to which they do not assent.

For the Mayo Clinic:

LAST：Newest product unique design kato square box mod clone kato mod box 18500 kato mod from vsmokemall |NEXT：Newest Electronic Cigarette EGO-K