For Dr. Glantz's argument to be correct, then it must be the case that there are literally thousands of smokers out there who would have simply quit smoking if only it hadn't been for electronic cigarettes. Readers must recognize two important points about this argument:

Therefore, their use of these studies to draw conclusions about the efficacy of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation appears to me to be knowingly dishonest.

There is no medical advice on this website. Under no conditions should you assume that the opinions and advice you find here is meant to treat, cure, or otherwise prevent any ailment. The information on this site is the personal opinion of the authors and we take no accountability for this information to be used otherwise. Electronic cigarettes are not FDA approved, not 100% safe, and they should not be used by underage persons, or pregnant women. Smoking is dangerous and vaping can also cause health related issues. I are grateful to be of service and provide you valuable information at no cost. To do this, please be aware that when you click hyperlinks and buy products, in many (not every) instances I may receive some sort of affiliate compensation. Your support in purchasing with these hyperlinks allows me to assist people who smoke discover the information they are looking for to make the switch to the better alternative, electronic cigarettes.

As I had suggested in my September 2010 column, Judge Richard Leon's decision was based in large part on his finding that Dr. Benowitz's ongoing conflict of interest with pharmaceutical companies rendered him unable to objectively consider the issue of dissolvable tobacco products (DTPs).

LAST：Electronic Cigarette health electronic cigarette pcc bcc |NEXT：new product!!! airflow adjustable glass rebuildable atomizer 2014 arrowtank