If electronic cigarette companies were forced to adhere to the MSA, it would bring an end to all electronic cigarette brand name sponsorships, outdoor and transit advertising, branded merchandise, free product samples (except in adult-only establishments), and targeting of youth in advertising.

While as I said, I do not begrudge the CDC for holding this position on e-cigarettes, the fact that it is resorting to fabricating evidence in support of its position suggests that its position is untenable. If your position is strong, you should be able to support it with actual facts and scientific evidence. When all you can do to support your position is to produce false and misleading propaganda, then it's pretty clear you don't have a leg to stand on.

Both of these methods have their pros and cons, however in light of the recent electronic cigarettes popularity, tobacco harm reduction is gaining support from tobacco users and professionals.

The reason for the failure of these researchers to disclose their past relationships with the tobacco industry is not entirely clear, but may revolve around their interpretation of the conflict of interest disclosure form's requirements. In section 3 of the form, authors of articles are asked to disclose any financial relationships with industry that occurred within the past three years. However, neither of the two co-authors has received money from any tobacco companies since 2010.

LAST：2014 new arrival high quality in stock igo w4 atomizer igo w igo w4 |NEXT：2014 best selling variable voltage Ego c Twist battery