One possible answer appears in Wride's column. She writes:

Ironically, Stan Glantz criticized the study specifically because it examined the effect of electronic cigarettes on quitting among smokers who desired to quit. According to an in the New York Times: "Stanton A. Glantz, a professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, said the study’s limitation was that it tried to measure the effect of e-cigarette use only among smokers who were trying hard to quit, not all smokers."

I am not going to beat a dead horse and get into why the lack of evidence should not be a reason for supporting an outright ban. Especially since there already has been that has shown second hand vapor is a hazard to others that are not using electronic cigarettes. Instead, I am concerned with how the United Nations Organization that’s sole purpose is to battle emerging and current health crises.

Is this really the way we want our federal health agencies to treat cigarettes? As a product that is of such little concern that it may be no more harmful than the combination of nicotine and propylene glycol in an electronic cigarette?

Since nothing is known about the effects of third-hand smoke on wound healing, it seems very appropriate that this research team is going to investigate this research question using a mouse model to find out whether there are adverse effects of thirdhand smoke.

LAST：Gift Box New Herb Vaporizer Pen Wholesale E Cigarette Starter Kits |NEXT：Hangsen C5R Pro Hot Selling CE5 eGo C twist kits newest ego twist