The Senate Finance Committee will hold a hearing on the proposed electronic cigarette tax tomorrow at 4:00 pm. Hopefully, the Committee members will vote on the side of protecting the public's health rather than protecting cigarette profits.

One of the basic ethical principles of public health is transparency. It is our responsibility to be forthright with the public about the basis of our opinions about public policy, not to merely express our support or opposition for those policies.

And this is why when some responded to our proposal for a randomized behavioral study by arguing that such an approach was invalid and that we should do a survey instead, I viewed those responses as being unscientific and unsound. Instead, I believe what is truly behind these draconian opinions (draconian because they would throw out an entire line of potential evidence) is a bias towards electronic cigarettes. I'm not arguing that it is a conscious bias. It may be subconscious. But I don't believe that any objective scientist would argue for completely throwing out a randomized clinical study design and relying solely on survey evidence to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of a product such as electronic cigarettes.

LAST：Wholesale price huge vapor hicig mini e cigarette,hicig |NEXT：1.6ml Ce4 Clearomizer eGo Ce4 Start Kit Starter Set eGo Ce4 Wholesale