Second, the advocates want the same type of marketing and other restrictions that apply to cigarettes to apply equally to e-cigarettes. They are afraid that defining electronic cigarettes honestly might put a damper in those plans.

Here, they find a correlation between e-cigarette use and higher and more sustained levels of smoking. But because this is a cross-sectional study, they cannot determine which came first. In other words, what is the direction of the causal relationship? Does the e-cigarette use precede, and cause, the smoking? Or does the smoking precede, and cause, the e-cigarette use?

This is particularly disturbing, as five years have passed and numerous studies have been published since the FDA originally told the public that cigarette smoking may be than using non-tobacco, non-combusted electronic cigarettes.

In an published in BU Today, I argue that the tobacco control movement has been co-opted by a bureaucracy of large national organizations that are more interested in putting feathers in their cap than actually saving lives from smoking.

3. Also in contrast to what we reported above, the journals in which these articles were published have not asked the authors to correct their disclosures by revealing their significant history of financial relationships with the pharmaceutical industry.

LAST：Smile 2014 new product e mart/e smart electronic cigarette/ecig smart pcc |NEXT：High Quality Vaporizers mechanical mod stainless steel e cigarette start kit wholesale ego vapor