I went with the safer route and ordered my base (VG) to have 3mg of nicotine premixed in it. I choose 100% VG as I have a PG allergy. You can pick whatever ratio you guys are used to using in your E-Juices as well. Another reason why I did this was I didn’t want pure nicotine around the house either. The VG with the 3mg nicotine came in a tub that unscrewed from the top.

The rest of the story is that despite the Common Rule and the intense efforts to try to prevent human subject violations in research, there are still occasional studies which find their way through the cracks. This is one bad example. It is an example of an unethical experiment that should never have been approved by an IRB in its current form because it blatantly violates the ethical principles of both consent and informed consent.

What the story demonstrates is that Dr. Glantz has a pre-determined set of conclusions about electronic cigarettes and the tobacco companies' role in inappropriately marketing these products to addict a new generation of kids. When presented with information, he jumps to an immediate interpretation and conclusion that supports his pre-determined schema. Instead of exercising critical judgment and objective evaluation of the evidence, he immediately twists the facts to support his pre-existing position. Dr. Glantz is just one example of a phenomenon that characterizes a number of researchers and tobacco control groups that are vehement opponents of electronic cigarettes for ideological, rather than valid scientific reasons.

LAST：US Made eLiquid - Black Cherry Pina Colada |NEXT：Hangsen Electronics new arrivals electronic cigarette e cigs