If the Senate truly wants to reduce cigarette smoking and protect the public's health, it will shift its attack from e-cigarette companies which are trying to get the public off tobacco cigarettes and over to the federal government, which is doing everything it can to protect the cigarette market.

However, from a public health perspective, the relevant question is not what results one would obtain if smokers were forced to use a particular strategy, but what results are obtained when smokers make the choice to use a particular strategy. This is why Stan Glantz's approach is inappropriate.

In 2014, not even the tobacco companies would dare to suggest that minor changes in cigarette design could lead to substantial improvements in the public health safety of these products. And any company that did would be charged immediately into the courtroom. But there is one entity that is still spewing this crap to the public. Shockingly, it's our own government, and its leading supposed tobacco control agency.

There is a good theoretical explanation: the flavors.

These politicians should stop lying to the American public in order to support their pre-determined agenda. Science, not politics, should guide public health policy in this nation.

LAST：2014 Top selling Ecig carry case,leather electronic cigarette case |NEXT：Christmas wholesale gt-s mechanical battery mod vv/vw gt-s mod 510 pcc