Instead, what we need are FDA regulations that will prevent the marketing of electronic cigarettes to youth. An outright ban on e-cigarette advertising is neither sensible nor constitutional.

Today, I reflect on what this story demonstrates about the scientific bias that is apparent in the anti-smoking movement, particularly among researchers like Dr. Glantz, who has repeatedly misinterpreted scientific studies in order to skewer electronic cigarettes.

Harris et al., in perhaps the most comprehensive and definitive on this issue, found a clear increase in cancer risk associated with non-filtered cigarettes. As they reported: "Compared with smokers of medium tar (15-21 mg) filter cigarettes, risk was higher among men and women who smoked high tar (> or = 22 mg) non-filter brands (hazard ratio 1.44, 95% confidence interval 1.20 to 1.73, and 1.64, 1.26 to 2.15, respectively)."

Yesterday, I reported that Drs. Stan Glantz and Simon Chapman issued against Lorillard for running an inappropriate blu e-cigarette commercial (the robot sex ad). The truth is that Lorillard had nothing to do with the ad, which was produced in 2010, well before Lorillard acquired blu.

According to a new published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, asthmatic smokers who use electronic cigarettes experience an improvement in their asthma symptoms and lung function, even if they remain dual users.

LAST：ismoka The iGo Simple Pack 3 |NEXT：2014 Top-class multiple colors wholesale electronic cigarette,ce4 vape pen starter kit bulk e cigarette purchase ego ce4