The positions taken by these groups are actually very reasonable. In fact, I completely agree with their positions as stated in the op-eds and articles that Glantz cites. As it turns out, I am quoted in a number of these articles. So does this mean that I, too, am being orchestrated by electronic cigarette companies to push their policy agenda?

Some of the researchers and advocates who opposed our crowdfunding campaign to raise money for a randomized behavioral study of the effects of electronic cigarettes on smoking behavior argued that randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are simply not appropriate to study e-cigarettes because they cannot simulate the real-life situation, where smokers have many choices of different types of products, can engage with social networks, and can experiment over time, change products, advance from one type of product to another, etc.

This same cause and effect theory tells us that: if the likelihood of quitting smoking is low, smoking will continue to kill people. It is like the system is broke, and we are foolish to continue to use the same tactics and expect different results. We continue to try to get smokers to quit, but as long as tobacco is available, people are going to suffer from .

LAST：DHL SHIPPING powerful 18650 Provic S3 mod cheap e liquid |NEXT：2014 atomizer exgo 28mm atomizer fogger v4 atomizer