What the story demonstrates is that Dr. Glantz has a pre-determined set of conclusions about electronic cigarettes and the tobacco companies' role in inappropriately marketing these products to addict a new generation of kids. When presented with information, he jumps to an immediate interpretation and conclusion that supports his pre-determined schema. Instead of exercising critical judgment and objective evaluation of the evidence, he immediately twists the facts to support his pre-existing position. Dr. Glantz is just one example of a phenomenon that characterizes a number of researchers and tobacco control groups that are vehement opponents of electronic cigarettes for ideological, rather than valid scientific reasons.

There are many reasons and ways to quit smoking. Some people use medications, patches, gum, hypnosis, and some quit smoking cold turkey. There are many good ways to stop smoking and I recommend that you try as many methods as you can to help you quit. E-cigarettes are not a stop smoking product and only offer an alternative to smoking.

My Step-Dad told me about e-cigarettes and how they helped him quit, and he has tried repeatedly to quit smoking to. So i decided to try one and see if it was worth it.

In the article, Joe Keohane writes:

For this reason, I believe there is a serious question as to the constitutionality of this provision of the deeming regulations. The government cannot interfere with commercial speech unless that interference is necessary to promote a legitimate government interest. The only way that the government could show that a ban on stating that electronic cigarettes are safer than tobacco cigarettes advances a legitimate government interest would be to provide evidence that electronic cigarettes are not safer than real cigarettes. Since such evidence does not exist, the government would have a difficult time making the case. Therefore, I believe that if the deeming regulations are promulgated in their current form, this aspect of the regulations will be successfully challenged by the electronic cigarette industry.

However, this deterrent effect - if present - depends upon the availability of flavored electronic cigaretttes. If only tobacco and menthol e-cigarettes were to be allowed on the market, this deterrent effect could no longer take place.

If the Senate truly wants to reduce cigarette smoking and protect the public's health, it will shift its attack from e-cigarette companies which are trying to get the public off tobacco cigarettes and over to the federal government, which is doing everything it can to protect the cigarette market.

LAST：Adjustable Airflow Plating Silver Contact Pin Hybrid Mod Ecig Delta X7 from Vapor Tech |NEXT：ego series/ego ce5 1100mah/ego battery connector with pcb