The Northampton Board of Health may not have created public health regulations that have any consistency or science base. However, they have created an excellent entry for the 2014 Hypocrisy of the Year Award.

What the FDA is stating is that it does not believe that it would be any worse for individual X to resume cigarette smoking than for her to remain an ex-smoker by continuing to vape. The FDA is stating that it is aware of no evidence to suggest that returning to cigarette smoking would be an unwise decision for this individual.

If this study leads some smokers to smoke inside because they believe the researchers, who say that thirdhand smoke is no less harmful than secondhand smoke, then this could lead to serious public health harm to children.

Perhaps it should be no surprise that these researchers have drawn such a wild and scientifically implausible conclusion like this, one which does not follow at all from their actual research. Why? Because, as I yesterday, these researchers had reached the conclusion of their study years ago, before even conducting the research! In fact, they drew their conclusions when they submitted their grant application. So it comes as no surprise to now see that they are drawing pre-determined conclusions that have nothing to do with their actual research.

LAST：2014 New product new disposable ecig Unicon disposable e cig water vapor wholesale |NEXT：2014 the Best self-cleaning personal vaporizer wax vaporizer exgo w1