This issue is particularly important because based on the arguments of these authors, the FDA should ban filtered cigarettes in order to protect the public's health. But in my opinion, such a move could be disastrous because it would result in a dramatic increase in tar delivery and possibly carcinogen dose, potentially leading to an increase, rather than a decrease in cancer.

If this is the kind of "scientific" reasoning that is going to guide the nation's decisions on how to handle tobacco products which are killing hundreds of thousands of Americans each year, then we may actually be better off reverting back to the "wild, wild west" that Stan Glantz keeps talking about. At least in that wild west, consumers are able to make reasonable judgments about the relative safety of different products. In the FDA-regulated "east," consumers are going to be kept hidden from even the most basic truths: that electronic cigarettes do not contain tobacco and that they are much safer than the real thing.

"Last September, in an withMedscape (a website for medical professionals), Thomas Frieden, director of the Centers forDisease Control and Prevention, said that "many kids are starting out withe-cigarettes and then going on to smoke conventional cigarettes." The samemonth he was by the Associated Press as warningthat e-cigarettes are "condemning many kids to struggling with a lifelongaddiction to nicotine."

The paper defends its ethical standards by arguing that it "was consistent with Facebook's Data Use Policy, to which all users agree prior to creating an account on Facebook, constituting informed consent for this research."

Many tobacco control advocates have asked me why, as a harm reduction supporter, I am always talking about the use of electronic cigarettes to help people quit smoking, rather than the use of smokeless tobacco products.

LAST：wholesale kamry x6 1300mah battery starter kit X6 V2 Starter kit X6 battery electronic cigarette |NEXT：pcc electronic cigarette 510