The rest of the story is that in yet another area of tobacco control science, the Surgeon General's report is providing a biased view of the scientific evidence.

It may sound like a strong, courageous action from a Board of Health that is being guided by the solid, consistent principle that all nonsmokers should be protected from exposure to secondhand smoke, period.

While I agree with the editorial, it is quite a condemnation of the current field of tobacco control research.

To make matters worse, Dr. Samet is not just an author, but served as one of the two editors of the report.

The communications director for another national anti-smoking group added: "This just goes to show that the tobacco companies have not changed. They will go to any extent to keep America's children smoking, even paying university scientists to do their dirty work for them."

The positions taken by these groups are actually very reasonable. In fact, I completely agree with their positions as stated in the op-eds and articles that Glantz cites. As it turns out, I am quoted in a number of these articles. So does this mean that I, too, am being orchestrated by electronic cigarette companies to push their policy agenda?

LAST：2014 E-cigarette new vaporizer igo w atomizer Special for ego w |NEXT：Beautiful lady design colored mini e cigarette 350MA e smart starter kit e smart women electronic cigarette