Why is the CDC unable to tell the truth? Why can't the agency even issue a statement that is internally consistent on this issue? Why is the CDC ignoring the wealth of evidence that it admits exists, which shows that many ex-smokers have used electronic cigarettes effectively as a smoking cessation aid?

It's easy to see that a ban on flavors is essentially a ban on electronic cigarettes. It would ban virtually every electronic cigarette currently on the market. Moreover, it would mean that there could only be one type of electronic cigarette liquid, which would have to contain just nicotine and propylene glycol and/or glycerine, and there would be no way for different liquids to distinguish themselves. The product would completely lose its appeal to smokers and the cigarette market would be protected forever.

The Rest of the Story

Far from being in touch with public health and science,Senator Blumenthal is lying to the public about the science in order to promotehis e-cigarette flavorings ban. The truth is that there is absolutely noscientific evidence that e-cigarettes addict youth and cause them to transitioninto a lifetime of smoking addiction.

The CDC is even worse. It actually acknowledges the existence of these former smokers, but still argues that there is no evidence that electronic cigarettes have helped any smokers quit.

In the deeming regulation proposal, the FDA states: "Many consumers believe that e-cigarettes are "safe" tobacco products or are "safer" than cigarettes. FDA has not made such a determination and conclusive research is not available."

LAST：New arrival 1.0ml CBD atomizer 510 pcc electronic cigarette cbd cartridge |NEXT：Ghoul Drip Tip - 510/901/KR808