For this reason, I am discouraged about the possibility that people like Dr. Glantz and Dr. Chapman will change their minds about the potential utility of e-cigarettes if further evidence accumulates to demonstrate the benefits of these products. The science is simply not going to matter to them. Hopefully, the science will matter to the FDA.

It is easy to see why this methodology is inappropriate to assess smoking cessation rates among smokers who use e-cigarettes in an attempt to quit smoking.

New York State Senator Kemp Hannon has introduced that would ban most electronic cigarettes, including both the rechargeable and modular types, while keeping toxic tobacco cigarettes on the market.

If the FDA doesn't have the evidence needs at the current time to conclude that smoking is more dangerous than vaping, then what kind of evidence will it take?

LAST：Vapor cigarette MT3 Clearomizer replaceable coil e cig cartomizer |NEXT：Youcig tech Factory ego ce4+ 1.6ml replace ce4+ coils fit battery 650mAh/900mah/1100mah