By that reasoning, Rolex, Pantene, and Save the Seals are also targeting youth for a lifetime of addiction, taking a page out of Big Tobacco's playbook.

The Rest of the Story

For example, Stan Glantz argued against electronic cigarettes in a Scientific American , claiming that: "We’ve found very high levels of dual use [traditional cigarettes along with e-cigarette use]. Very few people have switched away from cigarettes or managed to use them as a bridge to eventually go off cigarettes."

The Rest of the Story issued a call for a by CDC to clarify this error, but none was forthcoming.

Moreover, what scientific evidence is the FDA looking for in order to approve a simple claim that electronic cigarettes are safer than tobacco cigarettes? If the overwhelming current evidence is not sufficient, then no evidence will ever be sufficient because there is no further research that is necessary in order to draw this conclusion. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that a product which burns tobacco and produces tobacco smoke with more than 10,000 chemicals including more than 60 carcinogens and causes more than 400,000 deaths per year is more harmful than a product which merely heats and aerosolizes nicotine from a solution of propylene glycol.

LAST：TOP Quality Wholesale Cigarette Ecig Vase Clearomizer |NEXT：eGo T 1100mAh CE5 Clearomizer Kit,USB Charger Cartomizer Vapor