Would one therefore conclude that taking an exam is just as risky, in terms of respiratory effects, as smoking a cigarette? Apparently, Dr. Glantz would draw such a conclusion. But it is easy to see why this is an inappropriate conclusion. And we would never disseminate messages to the public that smoking is no more hazardous than taking an exam.

It is so frustrating to me to wake up every day to find another anti-smoking group spreading fraudulent statements about the health effects of cigarettes. This truly undermines decades of public education about the dangers of smoking. And it helps protect the profits of cigarette companies at the expense of the protection of the public's health.

This story demonstrates how low the integrity of research in the tobacco control movement has sunk. In today's tobacco control movement, we can draw conclusions before even conducting research because we are apparently capable of predicting the results of our experiments before they are carried out.

Instead, the federal government has helped protect the tobacco market by making this unscientific statement for them.

With that said, I can’t completely blame Senator Blumenthalbecause the CDC has been disseminating the false assertion that its recentsurvey demonstrated that e-cigarettes are a gateway to smoking addiction. So itappears that the lie originated with the CDC and then was adopted by SenatorBlumenthal. He may not be deserving of all of the blame here. The CDC must bearthe responsibility for originating this lie.

A defective cigarette is one which causes health effects "beyond those normally associated with tobacco product use."

LAST：Smoke anywhere product wax vaporizer pen exgo w1 |NEXT：Shenzhen dna30 mod reliable quality with high technology sx350 dna30 chip