Perhaps the most useful contribution of this paper is that it readily demonstrates why the approach being used by Stan Glantz to assess the effectiveness of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation is inappropriate and leads to erroneous conclusions.

Think of it this way: Individual X has smoked 2 packs per day for 30 years. She has tried, unsuccessfully, to quit smoking using the nicotine patch and nicotine gum. Finally, she has successfully quit smoking using electronic cigarettes.

But here is why that knee-jerk reflex that CTFK exhibits any time a tax increase is discussed is short-sighted and premature.

For Stan Glantz:

LAST：Huge vapor and pure feeling e cigarette ce9 2.4ml capacity |NEXT：2013 best selling products E Cigs EGO-W with clearomizer