Ironically, Dr. Glantz (and numerous anti-smoking groups) are supporting the protective legislation. Which raises the question: Who is acting more as a Big Tobacco front group? The e-cigarette associations, which are fighting protective legislation for tobacco cigarettes, or Glantz and the anti-smoking groups, which are trying to get protective legislation ensconced in every state throughout the country, so that cigarette profits are protected nationwide?

This argument is fallacious, I believe, because there are many things that changed from one cohort to the next. The introduction of cigarette filters is only one such change. To assume that any observed changes in cancer risk from one cohort to the next must be attributable to one particular change - the filter - is not appropriate, in my view.

Overall, ASH reported that "98% of children who have never smoked have never even tried an electronic cigarette."

LAST：2014 Hot Sell E Cigarette EGO-K Kit |NEXT：2013 Sex product e cigrette wholesale bulk buy from china ecigator ecig evod bcc atomizer evod blister kit