Another problem with what Dr. Glantz has done is that it is fundamentally dishonest. He is essentially lying to the public about the science regarding electronic cigarettes. He knows full well - as he acknowledges in the paper - that this study provides no answer regarding whether e-cigarettes precede and lead to smoking or whether youths who are heavier and more dependent smokers are more likely to experiment with e-cigarettes. Nevertheless, he is telling the public that he has answered the question and that the answer is that e-cigarette use precedes and leads to smoking. This is tantamount to lying to the public.

(JonathanFoulds PhD, Susan Veldheer MS RD, Jessica Yingst, Shari Hrabovsky RN MSN. Comparison of dependence on electroniccigarettes and regular cigarettes in a large sample of e-cig users. PennState University College of Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences,Hershey, PA.)

However, there was one thing that bugged me a bit, with how the machine worked; there are only so many combinations he could have, that is if you preferred a certain combination PG and VG they could not make it for you. I personally prefer no PG at all in my E-Juices; however, that wasn’t one of the options that the machine made. They did have high VG but with my PG allergy, I unfortunately could not partake in their E-Juices.

Instead, the federal government has helped protect the tobacco market by making this unscientific statement for them.

LAST：2013 Hot New Products Electronic Cigarette EGO CE4 Clearomizer CE4 Atomizer |NEXT：EVOD battery clearomiser cartomizer various colours