Instead, the law created a huge bureaucracy full of red tape and sluggish approval processes such that there are still close to 3500 substantial equivalence applications stacked up in a pile somewhere, and the FDA is so overburdened that it cannot even issue electronic cigarette regulations in a reasonable amount of time.

The problem is that in this cross-sectional study, there is no way to determine the direction of the observed relationship.

But tobacco abstinence is not the only theory…

In other words, it is time to acknowledge that the law was flawed. It is not the cigarette companies that are to blame for the fact that consumers still understand which brand is which. The law is to blame. If the intent of Congress were to ban any brand that might mislead consumers, then the Congress should simply have banned these brands, requiring them to be pulled from the market.

LAST：New ohm resistance meter,portable cartomizer and atomizer ohm meter,ecig 510 ohm meter |NEXT：The latest design singles ego-ce4 electronic cigarette smart pcc