The most telling point is that blu does not offer its disposable products in flavors other than tobacco (classic) or menthol. Note that the disposable products are the ones that are relevant to children because they are the cheapest and most likely to be used by kids. It is very unlikely that kids are going to unleash the money required to purchase the charging kit. Blu offers rechargeable starter kits that do contain flavorings, but does not offer the disposables in flavors other than tobacco or menthol. Kids would have to shell out a minimum of $70 for the starter kit.

Yes, this is satire. But it makes the point that the very same arguments that the lawmakers are using to implicate electronic cigarettes in targeting youth could be made to implicate nicotine replacement products such as nicotine gum and lozenges.

Using children cannot be a reason either. Yes, I agree some regulation is needed for advertising done and the bottles need to be properly labeled and child proof. However, there have been so little cases of nicotine poisoning and deaths that it seems absurd to use this as a justifiable reason. Not to mention most (I’m saying 99%) of all vendors do not advertise to children.

This move will be destructive to the public's health. It will literally cause disease and death by increasing cigarette consumption. The proposed tax is high enough that it will deter many smokers from quitting by using electronic cigarettes. It may even result in some vapers returning to cigarette smoking because the economic advantage is no longer present.

LAST：Asmart updated billet box mod hana modz cloupor billet box mod 1:1 clone wax ecig exgo w2 |NEXT：huge vapor x6 ecig 510 thread 1300mah long battery variable original X6 ecig