For years, we in tobacco control have attacked tobacco industry-funded scientists or researchers who consulted for tobacco companies for not disclosing their conflicts of interest. It it therefore quite unfortunate, and ironic, that tobacco control researchers do not appear to take their own conflicts of interest seriously and that they, too, are hiding these conflicts from the public.

Now some establishments (especially bars) have weighed in and allowed vaping indoors. I personally always ask the bartender or the manager on duty whether it is okay or not. It is a privilege to be able to vape indoors and like most privileges it can be taken away if it is abused. I’m talking to the high powered personal vaporizer users (myself included) out there!!! Leave your fog machine at home and instead bring your mod (or ) that gets the job done but doesn’t turn your local watering hole into a rave at anightclub.

Sadly, the answer is:

"The paper, "Short-term effects of electronic and tobacco cigarettes on exhaled nitric oxide," by Sara Marini, et al, just published in Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (Volume 278, Issue 1, 1 July 2014, Pages 9–15), reports important data showing that nicotine e-cigarettes, non-nicotine e-cigarettes, and conventional cigarettes all have similar effects of depression of exhaled nitric oxide."

Like Senator Blumenthal's statement which I discussed yesterday, this piece by the American Lung Association is completely divorced from science and scientific evidence and falls solidly into the realm of political propaganda.

LAST：ego c twist e cigarette with ce4 ce5 ce6 high quality |NEXT：Hot Selling ismoka Eleaf igo with Original Quality