Instead, as Altria Client Services, Lorillard, and AEMSA have all recommended, the FDA should scrap the requirement for pre-market review of electronic cigarettes, at least until the effective date of the final regulations. After that time, applications for new products would be required, unless they could show substantial equivalence compared to a product already on the market (as of the final regulation effective date).

Congratulations to Mayor Canepa, for making an early bid for the 2014 .

If it was the anti-smoking groups' intention to remove these products from the market, then they should have made sure that the legislation removed these products from the market. But given that they did not do that, these groups cannot stand up today and pretend that the problem is the tobacco companies circumventing the law. The problem is the law itself, and the fact that it expressly permits the companies to rename and repackage the products formerly known as "lights" or "milds." Thus, these anti-smoking groups have no one to blame but themselves.

The problem is that in this cross-sectional study, there is no way to determine the direction of the observed relationship.

LAST：Original design Mutation X RDA atomizer MOD clearomizer |NEXT：Rechargeable Electronic Cigarette cartomizer clear atomizer MT3 Atomizer