It is remarkable that despite all of the widespread marketing of electronic cigarettes and the claims that these products represent a safer alternative to smoking, the public is still split down the middle as to whether cigarette smoking is any more hazardous than vaping.

Instead, I think that studies which specifically compare lung cancer risk between lifelong smokers of filtered vs. non-filtered cigarettes during the same time period are most informative regarding the relative cancer risks of these products. And multiple studies along these lines, including recent studies, have reported a slightly decreased risk associated with lifetime smoking of filtered vs. non-filtered cigarettes.

The Rest of the Story has that the Mayo Clinic has lied to the American public by telling them that absolutely no studies have examined the health effects of electronic cigarettes and that doctors have no way of assessing the impact of this product, and has ordered the Mayo Clinic to make this statement. Here is the truth:

For one thing, it puts the government in the business of promoting smoking. It removes any incentive for the legislature to support any strong actions to reduce smoking. Were that to happen, the Philadelphia school system would go under. Does it not seem somewhat perverse that in order to support public education for Philadelphia children, we need to hope that people continue to smoke at high rates?

LAST：2014 new arrival high quality x6 ecig Low MOQ from Shenzhen |NEXT：2014 new arrival double coil clearomizer rebuildable clearomizer airflow adjustable bottom coil atomizer