I can only hope that this new study will help the FDA realize the folly of its proposed approach to electronic cigarettes and develop a new set of regulations that directly set standards for the safety of the product.

The misinformation in the tobacco control field is so widespread that hardly a day goes by that an anti-smoking advocate somewhere doesn't publicly declare that smoking may be no more dangerous than vaping. Yesterday, it was the Sedgwick County Health Department (Wichita, KS), which wrote in an op-ed in the Kansas City Star:

To highlight the absurdity of this aspect of the deeming regulations, it means that electronic cigarette companies will not be allowed to even claim that their product is free of tobacco. The law states that a tobacco product manufacturer cannot claim that "the tobacco product or its smoke does not contain or is free of a substance." In other words, an electronic cigarette company cannot claim that its electronic cigaretes do not contain, or are free of, tobacco.

This morning, the FDA finally released its draft for electronic cigarettes. Here is my initial take on these draft regulations from a public health perspective. I have divided my analysis of the 241 pages of provisions into three sections: the good, the bad, and they ugly.

LAST：2014 in stock original itaste clk innokin |NEXT：Top quality dry herb vaporizer ego,ego ce4 dry herb vaporizer,ego dry herb atomizer