Clearly, this statement by the CDC is intended to imply that Big Tobacco has been fighting the FDA's attempts to first ban and now regulate the product. This is false. In fact, the tobacco companies were not involved in the earlier lawsuit and since entering the market, they have strongly supported the FDA's regulation of electronic cigarettes.

The truth is that the authors of this study did not intend to examine the effectiveness of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation. They have in fact explicitly stated that their results cannot and should not be used to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of e-cigarettes.

Clearly, the FDA does not believe that there is sufficient evidence at the present time to conclude that cigarette smoking is any more hazardous than vaping.

Unfortunately, ANR is so determined to attack electronic cigarette use that it has abandoned scientific integrity and is spreading misinformation to the public. While ANR has every right to advocate against the use of electronic cigarettes, it should not do so based on false and misleading information.

That the CDC has apparently drawn pre-determined conclusions about these questions is both inappropriate and unfortunate. And it is not only unscientific but it precludes the agency from making evidence-based decisions or recommendations.

•Ads must make clear that the product is an e-cigarette and not a tobacco product

LAST：ego k electronic cigarette e-cig ce4 ce5 ce6 |NEXT：2014 Newtowe New Design Portable Wholesale No Leaking E-cigarette Cartomizer