If this was advice given by Glantz to a smoker he was treating, it would represent malpractice. Instead, it is what I consider to be public health malpractice.

The authors write: "Consistent with the only other longitudinal population-level study with 1-year follow-up that we are aware of, we found that e-cigarette use by smokers was not followed by greater rates of quitting or by reduction in cigarette consumption 1 year later."

In contrast, I'm not aware of a single study showing that banning smoking everywhere on college campuses or on beaches is necessary to protect the public from any substantial public health threat.

The Rest of the Story

Why would we want to suppress the provision of this information to the public? And what justification is there for a government-mandated suppression of the truth?

LAST：ego auto battery Colorful ego battery ecigs ego battery with factory price |NEXT：Wholesale And High Quality Ecigator Wholesale Battery Ego C Twist