Ironically, Dr. Glantz (and numerous anti-smoking groups) are supporting the protective legislation. Which raises the question: Who is acting more as a Big Tobacco front group? The e-cigarette associations, which are fighting protective legislation for tobacco cigarettes, or Glantz and the anti-smoking groups, which are trying to get protective legislation ensconced in every state throughout the country, so that cigarette profits are protected nationwide?

In fact, this is precisely what Trueba et al. demonstrated in a of changes in exhaled nitric oxide levels in 41 healthy college students.

In 2011, a federal court in the USA gave the Food and Drug Administration the permission to regulate e-cigarettes under the same laws as tobacco consumption. This was due to the fact that these devices provide nicotine just like the real thing. In the UK, the government has taken a different stance and according to the NHS, they are to be considered a medical aid to help smokers kick the habit. This will be brought into play in 2016 and until that date it is thought that e-cigarettes will remain in that grey area that allows their sales to be largely unregulated.

This is a complete disaster and is not in the interest of protecting the public's health. In fact, this provision is going to harm the public's health. It is going to require manufacturers to implicitly lie about the intended purpose and relative safety of their products.

LAST：New arrival ZNA 50 MOD clone 50W ZNA 50 big power |NEXT：E Cig Carrying Case,e-cigarette bag,ego ce5 starter kit