Just last week, the FDA indicated that even very in cigarette brands could pose major issues of public health significance, prompting the agency to disapprove one substantial equivalence application and to hold onto thousands more for over a year.

2. The regulations put a huge, if not insurmountable, obstacle in the way of new and innovative electronic cigarette products.

Certainly, Stan owes an apology to Jacob and he owes an apology to CATO as well.

Moreover, the study was a laboratory study involving mice. How could these reporters possibly extrapolate from a mouse study showing impairment of healing and liver damage in mice exposed to thirdhand smoke to the conclusion that thirdhand smoke is as harmful as active smoking?

If it were a public health policy based on some sort of health principles, then it certainly would not penalize ex-smokers who quit using electronic cigarettes. In contrast, it would actually reward these individuals for having quit smoking and perhaps saved their lives.

One of the key examples in question is a on the Cato Institute site in which Jacob Grier makes a number of insightful comments that are supportive of electronic cigarettes.

The Rest of the Story

LAST：2014-hot ego twist / ego c twist |NEXT：2014 new products 900mAh e smart electronic cigarette, Patent Smart PCC e-cigarette display