The rest of the story is that this is what the tobacco industry used to do. It is not how we in tobacco control should be conducting our business.

For this reason, I am discouraged about the possibility that people like Dr. Glantz and Dr. Chapman will change their minds about the potential utility of e-cigarettes if further evidence accumulates to demonstrate the benefits of these products. The science is simply not going to matter to them. Hopefully, the science will matter to the FDA.

Sadly, the FDA itself - in its proposed deeming regulations - that we do not yet know enough to determine whether vaping is any more dangerous than smoking. I find it horrific that the FDA - the agency which is going to supposedly be using science to make informed, evidence-based decisions regarding tobacco products - is not sure that cigarette smoking is any more hazardous than the use of fake cigarettes that contain no tobacco, involve no combustion, produce no secondhand smoke, have much lower levels of carcinogens, and have been found to acutely improve the health of smokers who switch to them.

LAST：Food-Grade 1:1 Clone Valkyrie Hybrid Mod Ehpro Valkyrie Mod For Factory Price |NEXT：E Cigarettes huge vapor Pyrex Glass1.6ml Anyvape A1 tank all replaceable parts & fit for BDC/BVC/BCC atomizer exgo w1