Sure, I understand that it is a lot more politically advantageous to go after smokers than it is to go after corporations and the wealthiest citizens. But it is also uncourageous. And it is certainly not leadership. Nor does it show vision.

In 2011, a federal court in the USA gave the Food and Drug Administration the permission to regulate e-cigarettes under the same laws as tobacco consumption. This was due to the fact that these devices provide nicotine just like the real thing. In the UK, the government has taken a different stance and according to the NHS, they are to be considered a medical aid to help smokers kick the habit. This will be brought into play in 2016 and until that date it is thought that e-cigarettes will remain in that grey area that allows their sales to be largely unregulated.

I hope that readers understand the specific point I am making here: using the authors' own assertions, it is apparent that they are aware of the inconsistency of their public statements. In other words, it appears that these authors are intentionally lying about the conclusions that follow from their study in order to mislead the media and the public about the role that e-cigarettes are playing with regards to youth smoking.

LAST：Portable E Cigarette Nemesis Mod e Cig Vaporzier Nemesis Mod Wholesale |NEXT：e cigarette reusable most popular pcc!!ego single or double kits ego battery with ce4