What is most disturbing to me about this story is that there is clearly no room for a difference in opinion in the tobacco control movement about certain dogmatic elements of the field. You can't express disagreement without facing personal attack, no matter how well you support your argument with scientific evidence. Like a religion, you can't challenge the gospel-like nature of movement's mantra without being viewed as a heretic.

The basic framework that the FDA has proposed to regulate e-cigarettes is that every product on the market (except a very few that were already on the market as of February 2007) must submit a new product application. These applications must demonstrate to the FDA that the introduction of the product to the market is appropriate for the public's health.

New York State Senator Kemp Hannon has introduced that would ban most electronic cigarettes, including both the rechargeable and modular types, while keeping toxic tobacco cigarettes on the market.

Mark Ten: nicotine, PG, VG, flavorings

These studies are simply ignored by the Surgeon General's report and by my colleagues who have attacked me. It would be one thing if there were no evidence for my opinions, but it's hardly appropriate to attack an individual for expressing an opinion that is backed up by scientific studies.

LAST：alibaba hottest high quality evod 2 vaporizer original kanger evod 2 clearomizer with airflow control |NEXT：ego ce5 starter kit aspire CE5 BDC Atomizer 1.8ohm/2.1ohm,China wholesale e cigs Best bottom coil clearomizers