Why would we want to suppress the provision of this information to the public? And what justification is there for a government-mandated suppression of the truth?

Unfortunately, there have been numerous violations of this disclosure standard, as several commentators on electronic cigarette policy have failed to disclose their Big Pharma ties in published articles. I have highlighted many of these stories on my blog, but for one demonstrative example, see my on failed disclosures by an individual and an organization in the New York Times debate on electronic cigarettes.

Sure, but only if the revenue is used to directly benefit those who are bearing its burden. Raise the cigarette tax and use the money to fund anti-smoking programs and services, research, and treatment for smokers, especially in poorer communities and communities of color, and the policy is no longer regressive but progressive. It could reduce, rather than exacerbate existing income and health inequities.

LAST：2014 Fashion pyrex glass tank design replaceable coil heads stainless steel cartomizer cloutank iClear X.I |NEXT：2014 New products e cigarette mechanical hammer mod with vulcan rda atomizer