Electronic cigarettes are a multi-billion-dollar business overseas, but in Australia they remain largely unregulated and legally contentious.

Why would we want to suppress the provision of this information to the public? And what justification is there for a government-mandated suppression of the truth?

However, from a public health perspective, the relevant question is not what results one would obtain if smokers were forced to use a particular strategy, but what results are obtained when smokers make the choice to use a particular strategy. This is why Stan Glantz's approach is inappropriate.

LAST：Most popular no leakage ego electronic cigarette ego ce5 |NEXT：Custom neck straps ego lanyard ring supplier with printed logo