The weakness of the scientific argumentation of those opposed to electronic cigarettes demonstrates that in 2014, there simply is not much of a scientific argument to fall back on in opposing this innovation. The science isn't going to do it, so opponents have to rely on trite and meaningless assertions like:

While I cannot make the claim that e-cigarettes are 100% safe, I can offer information and resources to help you make an informed decision for yourself. I cannot legally promote e-cigarettes as a quit smoking product, I promote them as a smarter alternative to smoking for current smokers who cannot quit through other means.

The Rest of the Story

An organization such as WHO issuing such a report is absurd in my opinion. WHO should not concern themselves with such as a small matter as it is not a current or emerging health issue around the world. Using children and “not sufficient research” as their basis for their argument is weak at best and would be more damaging for new and current vapers alike. Lobbyists and large governments will most likely use this report as a basis to push their own agenda rather than for the greater good of the smokers out there currently. I see this as a slap in the face and I shed a tear for all my fellow vapers out there in the community. Today is indeed a sad day for us all.

Since Dr. Foulds' addiction scale correlates significantly with actual quitting behavior, one would expect that these results would eventually translate into higher rates of complete nicotine cessation in smokers who switch to electronic cigarettes.

LAST：Promotional price factory direct sale e cig vaporizer king mod |NEXT：Wholesale for Kanger T2 Atomizer with Tank System,High Quality E Cigarette Kanger T2 Atomizer Made in China Factory Direct Sale