While I agree with Stan on virtually every aspect of the regulation of cigarette marketing, we part ways when he advocates the suppression of the truth.

While research is clearly needed to understand the trajectory of youth use of electronic cigarettes, the Monitoring the Future survey data do not support the CDC's conclusion that these products are serving as a gateway to youth smoking.

The complete quote from this article:

Thus, the authors readily acknowledge that it is impossible from this study to determine whether or not e-cigarettes lead to smoking or whether smoking leads to e-cigarette experimentation.

Would one therefore conclude that taking an exam is just as risky, in terms of respiratory effects, as smoking a cigarette? Apparently, Dr. Glantz would draw such a conclusion. But it is easy to see why this is an inappropriate conclusion. And we would never disseminate messages to the public that smoking is no more hazardous than taking an exam.

LAST：vapor wholesale Seego G-hit k2 igo vaporizer |NEXT：2014 latest product hana DNA 30 box mod mechanical 30watts with 0.4 ohm huge vapor