Despite strong evidence that vaping is much safer than smoking, that e-cigarettes do not contain any tobacco or involve any combustion, that tens of thousands of smokers are successfully using these products to quit smoking or cut down substantially on the amount they smoke, and that smokers with obstructive lung disease who switch to electronic cigarettes experience and immediate improvement in their respiratory symptoms, it appears that the American College of Chest Physicians and its partner organizations in FIRS would rather see tens of thousands of vapers return to cigarette smoking than to maintain a much healthier, smoke-free or greatly smoke-reduced lifestyle.

If the FDA doesn't have the evidence needs at the current time to conclude that smoking is more dangerous than vaping, then what kind of evidence will it take?

In fact, this is precisely the way some are interpreting these findings. One on the study is entitled: "Think smoking outdoors always protects others? This study suggests not."

Yesterday, I reported that Drs. Stan Glantz and Simon Chapman issued against Lorillard for running an inappropriate blu e-cigarette commercial (the robot sex ad). The truth is that Lorillard had nothing to do with the ad, which was produced in 2010, well before Lorillard acquired blu.

LAST：2014 big capacity new product ecig ECrown S1 evaporator e cigarette with factory price |NEXT：Best ego ce5 blister usb ecig ecigator for sale