These politicians should stop lying to the American public in order to support their pre-determined agenda. Science, not politics, should guide public health policy in this nation.

Yesterday, I explained that the of electronic cigarettes by Stan Glantz and colleagues published this week in the journal Circulation is because it draws conclusions about the efficacy of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation from studies that were not designed to measure such effects in the first place. These studies did not examine smoking cessation rates among a cohort of smokers who were identified at baseline as using e-cigarettes with the intention of quitting smoking. Moreover, smokers who use e-cigarettes are likely more heavily addicted to nicotine and may be more resistant to quitting, thus making inferences about cessation effectiveness from these studies inappropriate.

Further, the FDA is asking smokers who suffer such extra-ordinary health effects to report them to the agency. But the FDA doesn't want to hear from you if you simply suffer a "normal" health effect, like crippling obstructive lung disease, inability to breathe, metastatic cancer, or brain infarctions. In order to engage the FDA's interest, the health problem must be one that is beyond these "normal" product side effects.

LAST：Hot Selling Solar PCC for eGo Electronic Cigarette Vaporizer,Best Quality Solar Panel |NEXT：Hottest selling EVOD kit,high quality and competitive price evod e-cigarette cartomizer