Since electronic cigarettes represent a huge threat to cigarette sales - as many smokers are switching to electronic cigarettes completely or reducing their cigarette consumption substantially and substituting vaping - this massive tax on electronic cigarettes would serve to protect cigarettes from competition, thus protecting Big Tobacco profits at the expense of the protection of the public's health.

2. Between 2010 and 2012, the other co-author conducted studies using a variety of smokeless tobacco products. While the studies were not funded by a tobacco company, the study products were provided free of charge by U.S. Tobacco. Previously, this co-author did conduct tobacco industry-funded studies, which he acknowledged in a 2008 publication. This funding apparently goes all the way back to at least 2000. In addition, the researcher used to do consulting work for Star Scientific, U.S. Tobacco, Liggett, and Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, although none of that consulting occurred within the past three years.

Perhaps it should be no surprise that these researchers have drawn such a wild and scientifically implausible conclusion like this, one which does not follow at all from their actual research. Why? Because, as I yesterday, these researchers had reached the conclusion of their study years ago, before even conducting the research! In fact, they drew their conclusions when they submitted their grant application. So it comes as no surprise to now see that they are drawing pre-determined conclusions that have nothing to do with their actual research.

LAST：New product best selling eicgs china supplier e cig green smoking |NEXT：2014 hot sale most popular electronic cigarette green smoke