Using children cannot be a reason either. Yes, I agree some regulation is needed for advertising done and the bottles need to be properly labeled and child proof. However, there have been so little cases of nicotine poisoning and deaths that it seems absurd to use this as a justifiable reason. Not to mention most (I’m saying 99%) of all vendors do not advertise to children.

But sadly, I have no doubt about how to answer the question I posed in the title for this post. I am sure that Stan will continue to defend his false accusations and allow them to stand, rather than to retract these defamatory remarks and apologize to Jacob and others whose reputations he defiled. Sadly, these tactics are acceptable in the tobacco control movement, as long as they are directed at tobacco companies (and now, electornic cigarette companies).

Commenting on these results, Deborah Arnott - the chief executive of ASH - stated:

At the end of the day, if you need to lie in order to make your point, it seems to me that you need to go back and reassess your position. I think today would be a good day for ANR to go back to the drawing board.

LAST：Starter Kit PCC with Up-To-100000-Puffs Atomizer |NEXT：Ecig Anubis mod mechanical mod fit for 18650 battery anubis mod