The Rest of the Story

It is perfectly reasonable for the government to intervene to prevent companies from making false or misleading claims to the public. Even severe infringement of free speech by corporations may be justified in the case of preventing the deception of consumers. However, there is little justification for prohibiting companies from telling consumers the truth, and there is no justification for suppressing the truth when those facts are the most pertinent information that the consumer needs to know in order to make an informed decision about using the product.

Another recent study published late May in the Addiction Journal showed that the e-vapor produced in electronic cigarettes “can contain some of the toxinspresent in tobacco smoke, but at levels which are much lower.” This study conducted by 5 researchers, 2 of which were linked to a Federal Drug Administration tobacco panel, used approximately 81 different studies during its overall review. In conjunction, a scientific review on e-cigs from theconcluded with the comparison of conventional cigarettes, claiming that they are less likely to be as harmful. Peter Hajek of Londons Queen Mary University states “the evidence we currently have is clear: e-cigarettes should be allowed to compete against conventional cigarettes in the marketplace. Health care professionals may advise smokers who are unwilling to cease nicotine use to switch to e-cigarettes. Smokers who have not managed to stop with current treatments may also benefit from switching to e-cigarettes.”

This information is not included in the massive report.

LAST：high quality rebuildable protank 2 mini clearomizer |NEXT：Aspire CE5-S Electronic Cigarette aspire bdc clearomizer e cigarette