Roughly 67% of the physicians questioned in the research agreed that e-cigs can be a useful tool when looking for a solution in eliminating tobacco, 65% of the physicians believe that electronic cigarette usage represents a much less chance of cancer when compared to a typical tobacco cigarette, and 35% of the same physicians recommended e-cigs to their patients who smoke. These recommendations were still made regardless of the fact that the FDA has yet to regulate the use of e-cigarettes.

This issue is particularly important because based on the arguments of these authors, the FDA should ban filtered cigarettes in order to protect the public's health. But in my opinion, such a move could be disastrous because it would result in a dramatic increase in tar delivery and possibly carcinogen dose, potentially leading to an increase, rather than a decrease in cancer.

What this indicates is that this is not simply junk science. Rather, it is a deliberate attempt on the part of the investigators to misuse data. They are using these data to draw a conclusion about whether electronic cigarettes are effective in helping smokers quit, yet they are knowingly drawing upon data from smokers who are using e-cigarettes for other reasons, who may have simply tried an electronic cigarette once, and who most definitely were not using these products as part of a current quit attempt.

E-cig Taxes

LAST：best selling e-cigarette clearomizer mt3 evod atomizer evod / mt3 atomizer vaporizer |NEXT：igo w